Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 এর অধিকতর সংশোধনকল্পে প্রণীত অধ্যাদেশ যেহেতু নিম্নবর্ণিত উদ্দেশ্যসমূহ পূরণকল্পে Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act No. V of 1908) এর অধিকতর সংশোধন সমীচীন ও প্রয়োজনীয়; এবং যেহেতু সংসদ ভাঙিয়া যাওয়া অবস্থায় রহিয়াছে এবং রাষ্ট্রপতির নিকট ইহা সন্তোষজনকভাবে প্রতীয়মান হইয়াছে যে, আশু ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণের জন্য প্রয়োজনীয় পরিস্থিতি বিদ্যমান রহিয়াছে; সেহেতু গণপ্রজাতন্ত্রী বাংলাদেশের সংবিধানের ৯৩(১) অনুচ্ছেদে প্রদত্ত ক্ষমতাবলে রাষ্ট্রপতি নিম্নরূপ অধ্যাদেশ প্রণয়ন ও জারি করিলেন:-
(১) এই অধ্যাদেশ Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025 নামে অভিহিত হইবে।
(২) ইহা অবিলম্বে কার্যকর হইবে।
“(2) In every plaint, facts shall be proved by affidavit.” ।
উক্ত Code এর section 35A এর sub-section (1) এ উল্লিখিত “twenty” শব্দটির পরিবর্তে “fifty” শব্দটি প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে।
উক্ত Code এর section 51 এর clause (e) এ বর্ণিত “manner” শব্দটির পর “as may be provided hereinafter in the Code or” শব্দগুলি ও কমা সন্নিবেশিত হইবে।
উক্ত Code এর section 56 এ উল্লিখিত “a woman” শব্দগুলির পরিবর্তে “an old, infirm, pregnant or breast-feeding woman” শব্দগুলি ও কমাগুলি প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে।
উক্ত Code এর section 57 বিলুপ্ত হইবে।
উক্ত Code এর section 58 এর sub-section (1) এর প্রথমোক্ত proviso এর-
উক্ত Code এর section 94 এর পর নিম্নরূপ নূতন section 94A সন্নিবেশিত হইবে, যথা:-
“94A. Direction in execution of orders, etc.- For the purpose of execution of any decree or order, the Court may direct the executive authorities, including law enforcement agencies, to assist any person designated by it and to submit compliance report within the time specified by it.”।
উক্ত Code এর Order V এর rule 9 এর sub-rule (3) এ উল্লিখিত “transmission of documents through” শব্দগুলির পরিবর্তে “Short Message Service, Voice Calls, Instant Messaging Services,” শব্দগুলি ও কমাগুলি প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে এবং উল্লিখিত sub-rule (3) এর প্রান্তস্থিত (.) ফুলস্টপ চিহ্নের পরিবর্তে (:) কোলন চিহ্ন প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে এবং অতঃপর নিম্নরূপ proviso সন্নিবেশিত হইবে, যথা:-
“Provided that the proof of such service shall be kept in record.”।
উক্ত Code এর Order VII এর rule 1এর clause (b) ও (c) এর পরিবর্তে নিম্নরূপ clause (b) ও (c) প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে, যথা:-
“(b) the name, description and place of residence (including phone or mobile number, national identification number (NID) and email address, if any, of the plaintiff;
উক্ত Code এর Order IX এর rule 13 এর sub-rule (1) এর প্রান্তস্থিত (.) ফুলস্টপ চিহ্নের পরিবর্তে (:) কোলন চিহ্ন প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে এবং অতঃপর নিম্নরূপ proviso সন্নিবেশিত হইবে, যথা:-
“Provided further that no decree shall be set aside more than once under this rule at the instance of the same defendant.” ।
উক্ত Code এর Order XVII এর rule 1 এর sub-rule (3) এ উল্লিখিত “six” শব্দটির পরিবর্তে “four” শব্দটি প্রতিস্থাপিত হইবে।
উক্ত Code এর Order XVIII এর-
“4A. Examination-in-chief on affidavit and admissibility of documents.- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Code or the Evidence Act, 1872 (Act No. 1 of 1872), the facts stated in the plaint or written statement shall not be required to be orally stated or denied by the plaintiff or the defendant, as the case may be, and in every case, the examination-in-chief of the plaintiff or the defendant, as the case may be, shall be on affidavit and he may then be cross-examined and, if necessary, re-examined:
Provided that a copy of such affidavit shall be supplied to the other party before being furnished to the Court:
Provided further that where documents are filed along with the affidavit and the parties rely upon such documents, the proof and admissibility of those documents shall be subject to the orders of the Court.”;
উক্ত Code এর Order XXI এর-
“30A. Special provisions for execution of decree for payment of money.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Code, the Court may, on the application of the decree-holder, detain the judgment-debtor in the civil prison for the whole or any part of the decretal amount remaining unpaid, for a term not exceeding six months or until payment is made, whichever is earlier.
(2) The expense incurred for subsistence of the judgment-debtor detained in a civil prison under this Code shall be borne by the Government.
(3) The provision of detention in the civil prison shall not apply to a judgment-debtor who is a minor or of unsound mind or who has been declared as insolvent by a competent Court or who has been substituted as successor to the original judgment-debtor by inheritance.
(4) If the judgment-debtor in the civil prison deposits not less than 25% of the decretal amount together with a bond for payment of the remaining amount within 60 days, the Court shall release him and if the judgment-debtor fails to pay the remaining decretal amount as per the conditions stated in the bond, he shall be liable to be re-arrested and detained further in the civil prison which may extend to six months.
(5) If a judgment-debtor is detained for the entire term in the civil prison under sub-rule (1) or (4), he shall not be re-arrested or detained further in the civil prison in the same execution proceeding or in any other execution proceeding arising from the same decree.
(6) If a judgment-debtor is detained in the civil prison under this rule for the whole or any part of the term of civil detention, he shall not be exempted from paying the unpaid amount of the decree.”।
“104. Direct execution of decree.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Code or any other law for the time being in force, the Court may, subject to the law of limitation, receive an application for the execution of a decree in the record of the suit in which the decree has been passed, or, where the record has been called for by an Appellate or Revisional Court, in a part-file prepared for this purpose and the Court may forthwith order the execution of the decree.
(2) Where the decree-holder or the purchaser of the property sold in execution of a decree is resisted or obstructed by the judgment-debtor or any person claiming under him or any other person, as the case may be, in obtaining possession of the property and the Court is satisfied in that regard, it may, on the application of the decree-holder or the purchaser, direct any person as the Court may appoint in this behalf and, if necessary, the law enforcement agency to place the decree-holder or the purchaser in possession of the property.” ।
উক্ত Code এর Order XLI এর-
“Provided that no Appeal shall be re-heard more than once under this rule.”;
“(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), if neither party nor his pleader appears when the appeal is called on for hearing, the Appellate Court may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, if considers the materials on record are sufficient to dispose of the appeal on merits, pronounce judgment in open Court immediately or on a date to be fixed by it.” ।