An Ordinance to promote breast-feeding by regulating the marketing of breast-milk substitutes. WHEREAS it is expedient to promote breast-feeding by regulating the marketing of breast-milk substitutes and to provide for matters incidental thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the Proclamation of the 24th March, 1982, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President is pleased to make and promulgate the following Ordinance:-
(1) This Ordinance may be called the Breast-Milk Substitutes (Regulation of Marketing) Ordinance, 1984.
(2) It shall come into force on such date as the Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, appoint.
In this Ordinance, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-
No person shall make, exhibit, distribute, circulate, display or publish any advertisement-
No person shall promote any breast-milk substitute either by advertisement or by offering or giving any gift, prize, discount coupon, or other free item or by any other means.
(2) A breast-milk substitute shall be registered in such manner and on payment of such fees as may be prescribed.
(3) A registration granted under this section shall be valid for a period of three years and may be cancelled before the expiry of that period in such manner as may be prescribed.
(4) Registration of a breast-milk substitute shall be published in the official Gazette.
(1) No breast-milk substitute shall be marketed unless-
(2) Neither the container nor any literature kept inside the container shall have any picture of infant or such other picture or writing which may idealise the use of any breast-milk substitute.
(1) The Government may appoint an Advisory Committee consisting of a Chairman and not more than such number of other members as the Government may determine.
5(2) The Advisory Committee shall-Whoever contravenes any of the provisions of sections 3, 4 and 5 of this Ordinance shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine which may extend to five thousand Taka, or with both.
(1) If the person contravening any of the provisions of this Ordinance is a company, every person who at the time the offence has been committed was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the contravention and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this Ordinance if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), where any offence under this Ordinance has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or convinance of, or is attributable to, any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manger, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this section-
No Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Ordinance except upon a report in writing made by any officer authorised by the Government.
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the authorised officer for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Ordinance.
Explanation.- In this section, “authorised officer” means an officer authorised by the Government in writing to perform all or any of the functions under this Ordinance and includes any officer authorised by such authorised Officer.
The Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Ordinance.